Scientific and practical journal
УКР   ENG
Regional Economy
   



Journal Regional Economy -- re2019.03.071

UDC 332.122:338.43; JEL O18, Q18, R58
Khomyuk, N. L., & Pavlikha, N. V. (2019). Kontseptual'ni pidkhody do rozvytku sil's'kykh terytoriy v umovakh detsentralizatsiyi [Conceptual approaches to rural development in conditions of decentralization]. Rehional'na ekonomika - Regional Economy, 93 (3), 71-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2019-3-7. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 18

Authors

Resume

The purpose of the article is to unveil conceptual approaches to rural development based on the definition of various types of this development, to substantiate the directions of its diversification in the context of decentralization taking into account the experience of the European Union. The article explores the various types of rural development to substantiate the conceptual approaches to its provision in the context of decentralization reform. The generalization of scientific approaches to the types of rural development gives reason to claim that there is currently no single conceptual approach to the concept under study. Sustainable, balanced, resistant, agrarian, socio-economic, agricultural, integrated, complex, perspective types of rural development are identified. The concepts of “development of rural territories” and “rural development” are described and their use is proposed as identical. It is proposed to consider rural development as a socio-ecological-economic process of extended reproduction of rural development, which ensures harmonious growth of economic, social, demographic, ethnic and environmental spheres. The article determines that the notion of “sustainable”, “balanced”, “resistant” in the scientific literature is disclosed in the framework of the study of priorities for sustainable development of rural areas. The article confirms that the complex development of rural territories is connected with decentralization and creation of integrated territorial communities, which use available natural, economic, social and financial resources. Quality of life of rural residents is determined to be the general criterion that characterizes the development of rural areas. The authors reveal that when the rural population is involved in production on the territory of the community, the unemployment rate decreases, household incomes increase, local budget revenues grow at the expense of the personal income tax. Probable ways of rural development are analyzed on the basis of the experience of the European Union. The need to apply an integrated approach to rural development, that is, to identify this development as diversified, proportional and integrated, is substantiated.

Keywords:

rural development, decentralization, typology of rural development, sustainable rural development, quality of life for rural residents

References

    
  1. Vasyltsiv, T. H., & Boyko, V. V. (2016). Napryamy ta zasoby rozvytku sil’skykh terytoriy v konteksti zmitsnennya sotsial’no-ekonomichnoyi bezpeky Ukrayiny [Rural development trends and tools in the context of strengthening the socio-economic security of Ukraine]. Lviv: League Press. [in Ukrainian].
  2. Borodina, O. M., & Prokopa, I. V. (2010). Teoriya, polityka ta praktyka sil’s’koho rozvytku [Rural development theory, policy and practice]. Kyiv: Institute of Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
  3. Malik, M. Y., & Khvesyk, M. A. (2010). Stalyy rozvytok sil’s’kykh terytoriy na zasadakh rehional’noho pryrodokorystuvannya ta ekoloho-bezpechnoho ahropromyslovoho vyrobnytstva [Sustainable development of rural areas based on regional environmental management and environmentally friendly agro-industrial production]. Ekonomika APK – The Economy of Agro-Industrial Complex, 5, 3-12. [in Ukrainian].
  4. Pavlov, O. I. (2008). Sil’s’kyy rozvytok yak predmet naukovoho analizu [Rural development as a subject of scientific analysis]. In Aktual’ni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnya [Actual problems of public administration]: Vol 2 (pp. 154-161). [in Ukrainian].
  5. Buryak, M. I. (2015). Rehional’ni aspekty rozvytku produktyvnykh syl sil’s’kykh terytoriy u konteksti systemnykh reform [Regional aspects of development of productive forces of rural territories in the context of systemic reforms]. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho derzhavnoho ahrarnoho-ekonomichnyoho universytetu – Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk State Agrarian and Economic University, 4, 137-142. [in Ukrainian].
  6. Popova, O. L. (2012). Ahrosfera: sotsioekonomichnyy zmist i zasady staloho rozvytku [Agrosphere: socio-economic content and principles of sustainable development]. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 5(604), 73-84. [in Ukrainian].
  7. Khomyuk, N. L. (2018). Sutnist’ ponyattya "sil’skyy rozvytok" [The essence of the concept of "rural development"]. In Rozvytok sotsial’no-ekonomichnykh system v suchasnykh umovakh [Development of socio-economic systems in modern conditions]: Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference (Odessa, 2018, February 2-3) (pp. 46-47). Kherson: Young scientist. [in Ukrainian].
  8. Pavlikha, N. V. (2005). Kontseptual’ni zasady upravlinnya stalym rozvytkom prostorovykh system [Conceptual foundations of sustainable development of spatial systems management]. Lutsk: Nadstyr”ya. [in Ukrainian].
  9. Statystychnyy shchorichnyk Ukrayiny za 2017 rik [Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine for 2017] (2018). K.: State Statistics Committee of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
  10. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future (1987). Retrieved from http://www.exteriores.gob.es/Portal/es/PoliticaExteriorCooperacion/Desarrollosostenible/Documents/Informe%20Brundtland%20(En%20ingl%C3%A9s).pdf
  11. Kurman, T. V. (2016). Ponyattya ta oznaky staloho rozvytku sil’s’kohospodars’koho vyrobnytstva yak ahrarno-pravovoyi katehoriyi [Concepts and signs of sustainable development of agricultural production as agrarian and legal category]. In Naukovyy visnyk Natsional’noho universytetu bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannya Ukrayiny. Seriya: Pravo [Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine. Series: Law]: Vol. 243 (pp. 75-85). [in Ukrainian].
  12. Borodina, O. M. (Ed.) (2012). Sotsioekonomichnyy rozvytok sil’s’koho hospodarstva i sela: suchasnyy vymir [Socioeconomic development of agriculture and rural areas: a modern dimension]. Kyiv: Institute of Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
  13. Talavyrya, M. P. (2016). Rozvytok sils’kykh terytoriy na zasadakh stalosti [Rural development based on sustainability]. In Naukovyy visnyk Uzhhorods’koho universytetu. Seriya: Ekonomika [Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: Economics]: Vol. 1(47):2 (pp. 146-150). [in Ukrainian].
  14. Rusnak, A. V. (2012). Funktsiyi, zavdannya, chynnyky funktsionuvannya ta staloho rozvytku sil’s’kykh terytoriy [Functions, tasks, factors of functioning and sustainable development of rural areas]. In Naukovi pratsi Poltavs’koyi derzhavnoyi ahrarnoyi akademiyi. Ekonomichni nauky [Scientific works of Poltava State Agrarian Academy. Economic sciences]: Vol. 2(1) (pp. 244-248). [in Ukrainian].
  15. Cherevko, H., & Cherevko, I. (2010). Zrivnovazhenyy rozvytok sil’s’kykh terytoriy [Balanced development of rural territories]. Ahrarna ekonomika – Agricultural economics, 3(1-2), 57-64. [in Ukrainian].
  16. Kozyr, T. O. (2015). Praktychni aspekty stratehichnoho planuvannya rozvytku sil’s’kykh terytoriy [Practical aspects of strategic planning for rural development]. In Teoriya ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnya [Theory and Practice of Public Administration]: Vol. 3(26) (pp. 307-314). [in Ukrainian].
  17. Borshchevskyy, V. V. (Ed). (2012). Rozvytok sil’s’kykh terytoriy v systemi yevrointehratsiynykh priorytetiv Ukrayiny [Development of rural territories in the system of European integration priorities of Ukraine]. Lviv: Institute of Regional Research of NASU. [in Ukrainian].
  18. RDP Summaries (2016). European Network for Rural Development: Website. Retrieved from https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/policy-in-action/rural-development-policy-figures/rdp-summaries_en


Web Master P. Popadiuk