Scientific and practical journal
УКР   ENG
Regional Economy
   



Journal Regional Economy -- re2019.04.005

Repository of Institute of Regional Research UDC 33.025.7:330.341:32; JEL F29, H11, O20
Vovkanych, S. Y. (2019). Ideolohichni zasady eksklyuzyvnosti rozbudovy Natsional'noyi Derzhavy Ukrayiny [Ideological foundations of exclusive development of the National State of Ukraine]. Rehional'na ekonomika - Regional Economy, 94 (4), 5-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2019-4-1. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 7

Authors

Resume

Сurrent article, probably for the first time, analyzes the model of state-building, where the nation is considered to be conscious of its national idea of the future development. It argues that based on this Idea, the stratagems for building a nation-state of indigenous people with all the proper attributes are being developed. The title nation living in this state has an exclusive (exceptional) natural, cultural, religious and historical right to self-determination and protection. The paper notes that in a process of elimination of imperial assimilation barriers, these stratagems perform three fundamental and at the same time interrelated functions of spiritual revival: consolidation of the nation, its identification and integration into a civilized world. Everything impeding the realization of these core functions for national progress is stressed to be a remnant of the hostile neighbourhood of the past, which contemporaries must not keep for the future generation to attain a better future. In this context, an integrated approach to the National Idea is proposed as a set of integral stratagems of national progress, which made it possible to highlight the corresponding priorities of building a national state in each block of stratagems. For example, in the unity bloc - to return the peace and integrity of the country; in the defense of “ukrainianness” – not only to adopt, but also actually implement the law on the Ukrainian language, speed up de-communization, strengthen security in particularly in the national information space. As for the “dignity” bloc, one should not only “not embrace”, but also adhere to the vector of civilizational development, achieve admission to NATO, the EU, achieve high socio-economic living standards of people of developed countries, indicators of their well-being and recreation, protect their health; and at the same time - develop their own strength and resources. The achievement of the planned indicators before Ukraine admittance to NATO and EU, which constitute its homework, affects not only the named blocks of stratagems, but also the structure of global and regional factors, exclusive barriers that still lie in the field of Ukrainian studies of virgin land. In the paper the conclusion is made that in the conditions of an aggressive external environment and continued imperial support of the “fifth columns” in Ukraine - this poses a great danger to state sovereignty, national identity and European-NATO integration. Moreover, further disregard for them is deadly as a continuation of any war and imperial assimilation. In the circumstances of the hybrid war of Russia against Ukraine, it is vital for a person individually, existentially for a nation as a social community of people and globally dangerous for the development of the cultural diversity of humanity as a whole. Comprehensive account of these, triple-connected processes, is of great importance for developing an effective road map for the ultimate exit of Kyiv from the orbit of Moscow’s imperial claims, enhancing the self-exclusive subjectivity of Ukraine, and accelerating its accession to the number of free countries of the world.

Keywords:

Ukrainian National Idea, stratagems for nation-state building, barriers to national identity protection, information space

References

    
  1. Osnovnoy zakon: Izrail' – natsional'noye gosudarstvo yevreyskogo naroda [Basic law: Israel is the national state of the Jewish people] (2019). Knesset: Website. Retrieved from www.knesset.gov.i1/main/.ru [in Russian].
  2. Belebekha, I., & Vovkanych, S. (2010). Yednist’ i riznomanittya stratehichnykh priorytetiv natsional’noyi ideyi (ukrayins’ki derzhavotvorchi dialohy) [The unity and diversity of the strategic priorities of the national idea (ukrainian state dialogues)]. Series: Ideological issues of the 21st century. Lviv; Kharkiv. [in Ukrainian].
  3. Adzhemohlu, D., & Robinson, J. (2016). Chomu natsiyi zanepadayut’ [Why are the nations falling]. Kyiv: Our Format.
  4. Vovkanych, S. (2018, Jun 21). Pro synerhiyu natsiyi [On the synergy of the nation]. Day: Website. Retrieved from https://day.kyiv.ua/uk/article/polityka/pro-synergiyu-naciyi [in Ukrainian].
  5. Masaryk, T. G. (1919). Národnostní filosofie doby novější [National philosophy of the newer period]. Praha. [in Czech].
  6. Vovkanych, S. (2018, Sep 22) Ob"yednatysya v riznomanitnosti, abo Shche raz pro ukrayins’ku natsional’nu ideyu [To unite in diversity, or once again about the Ukrainian national idea]. ZN,UA: Website. Retrieved from https://dt.ua/SOCIUM/ob-yednatisya-v-riznomanitnosti-abo-sche-raz-pro-ukrayinsku-nacionalnu-ideyu-289082_.html [in Ukrainian].
  7. Vovkanych, S. (2018). Viziya ideolohiyi rozbudovy natsional’noyi derzhavy – eksklyuzyv ukrayins’koho narodu [Vision of the ideology of building a national state – an exclusive Ukrainian nation]. Narodoznavchi zoshyty – The Ethnology Notebooks, 6, 1347-1365. [in Ukrainian].


Web Master P. Popadiuk