Scientific and practical journal
УКР   ENG
Regional Economy
   



Journal Regional Economy -- re2021.03.036

Repository of Institute of Regional Research UDC 332.025; 332.13; JEL F01, R58, R23
Melnyk, M. I., & Leshchukh, I. V. (2021). Suchasni hlobal'ni vyklyky ta trendy: diahnostyka vplyvu na endohennyy rozvytok rehionu [Modern global challenges and trends: diagnostics of impact on the region’s endogenous development]. Rehional'na ekonomika - Regional Economy, 101 (3), 36-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2021-3-4. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 29

Authors



Melnyk Maryana Ivanivna

Doctor of Economics, Professor

Head of the Department of spatial development of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine

Contacts: mar.melnyk@gmail.com, (032)270-70-53, (+38099)72-93-873

Webpages:



Leshchukh Iryna Volodymyrivna

Ph.D. of Economics

Senior Researcher, Scientific Secretary of the unit of the Department of spatial development of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine

Contacts: ira_leschukh@ukr.net, ira_borsch@mail.ru, (+38096)751-33-89

Webpages:

Resume

Different approaches to the interpretation of the definition of “globalization” and assessments of its impact on the endogenous development of the state and regions are considered. The paper argues that global trends have a decisive influence on the economy and the potential of endogenous development of the regions of Ukraine in view of: strengthened polycentricity of spatial development; expansion of protectionist tendencies and global asymmetry; reduced level of functionality of international institutions; the beginning of regionalization of virtual networks. Based on the analysis of domestic and foreign scientific literature and analytical materials, the main modern globalization challenges and trends are revealed - strengthening the interdependence of the world’s economies; strengthening economic protectionism; growth of external debts of the world; growing inequality in income distribution, widening the gap between rich and poor countries; urbanization, metropolization; political, ideological, and military challenges, etc. The main areas of influence of these megatrends in the context of endogenous development of the region are named - the resistance of the region’s economy to cyclical global fluctuations and risks; the region’s involvement in global value chains; intellectualization of labor, human potential, knowledge economy, and creative economy; cohesion of spatial socio-economic development; cybersecurity of the region’s economy; virtualization of socio-political relations; digitalization; migration and tourist flows, etc. The paper proves that the impact of current global challenges and trends on the endogenous development of the region is multidirectional. Thus, some trends may pose risks and threats to the endogenous development of the region (i.e. cause deterioration of its socio-economic status), and others - may still have positive or neutral results despite the creation of certain threats to the security of the region.

Keywords:

globalization, endogenous development of the region, global trends, global challenges, socio-economic development, international trade, financial globalization

References

    
  1. Levitt, T. (1983, May). The Clobalization of Markets. Harvard Business Review: Website. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1983/05/the-globalization-of-markets
  2. Globalization: Definition, Benefits, Effects, Examples – What is Globalization? (2020, Oct 16). Youmatter: Website. Retrieved from https://youmatter.world/en/definition/definitions-globalization-definition-benefits-effects-examples
  3. Globalisation. Compass: manual on Human Rights Education with Youth Participation (2021). Council of Europe: Website. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/uk/web/compass/globalisation
  4. Heyets, V. M. (2005). Maybutnye Ukrayiny mizh YeS ta YeEP [The future of Ukraine between the EU and the EAS]. Kyiv: Institute of Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
  5. Held, D., & McGrew, A. (Ed.) (2016). The global transformations reader. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  6. Bardhan, P. (2006, Mar 26). Does Globalization Help or Hurt the World’s Poor? Scientific American: Website. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-globalization-help-o-2006-04
  7. Martell, L. (2017). The sociology of globalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  8. Birdsall, N. (2003, Mar 01). Asymmetric Globalization: Global Markets Require Good Global Politics. Brookings: Website. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/asymmetric-globalization-global-markets-require-good-global-politics
  9. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. NewYork: W. W. Norton.
  10. Hien, M. (2007). The Needs for Endogenous Development in the Era of Globalization: The Case of Thanh Hoa Province DO. Semantic Scholar: Website. Retrieved from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:12930589
  11. Vazquez-Barquero, A., & Rodriguez-Cohard, J. C. (2019 Dec). Local development in a global world: Challenges and opportunities. Regional Science. Policy & Practice, 11 (6), 885-897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12164
  12. Storonyanska, I. Z. (Ed.) (2019). Stale endohenne zrostannya rehioniv Ukrayiny v umovakh detsentralizatsiy [Sustainable endogenous growth of regions of Ukraine in the conditions of decentralization]. Lviv: Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
  13. Samimi, P., & Jenatabadi, H. S. (2014). Globalization and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence on the Role of Complementarities. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e87824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087824
  14. International Monetary Fund (2007). Globalization and Inequality. World Economic Outlook. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781589066885.081
  15. Prasad, E., Rogoff, K., Wei, S. J., & Ayhan Kose, M. (2003). Effects of Financial Globalizationon Developing Countries: Some Empirical Evidence. InternationaL Monetary Fund: Website. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/np/res/docs/2003/031703.pdf
  16. Hali, E., Levine, R., Ricci, L., & Slоk, T. (2002). International Financial International financia lintegration and economic growth. Journal of International Money and Finance, 21(6), 749-776.
  17. Ocampo, J. A., & Martin, J. (Eds.) (2003). Globalization and Development. A Latin American and Caribbean Perspective. Retrieved from https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Globalization-and-Development-A-Latin-American-and-Caribbean-Perspective.pdf
  18. Rafaela, D., & Walter, S. (2015). Globalization, Labor Market Risks, and Class Cleavages. In The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (рр. 133-156).
  19. Wassenaar, W. (2003). Providing services globally: the experience of internet pharmacy. Healthcare Papers, 4, 69-74.
  20. Baris, E., & McLeod, K. (2000). Globalization an dInternational Trade in the Twenty-First Century: Opportunities for and Threats to the Health Sectorinthe South. International Journal of Health Services, 30(1), 187-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/X4XQ-Y1A8-7LWE-LWMA
  21. Pang, T., & Guindon, G. E. (2004). Globalization and risks to health. EMBO reports, 5, S11-S16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400226
  22. MacPherson, D. W., Gushulak, B. D., Baine, W. B., Bala, Sh., Gubbins, P. O., Holtom, P., & Segarra-Newnham, M. (2009). Population mobility, globalization, and antimicrobial drug resistance. EID Journal, 15(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1511.090419
  23. Sigler, T., Mahmuda, S., Kimpton, A., Loginova, J., Wohland, P., Charles-Edwards, E., & Corcoran, J. (2021). The socio-spatial determinants of COVID-19 diffusion: the impact of globalisation, settlement characteristics and population. Global Health, 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00707-2
  24. Voroshylov, O. (2021). Vsesvitniy ekonomichnyy forum u Davosi-2021 [World Economic Forum in Davos-2021]. National Library of Ukraine named after VI Vernadsky: Website Retrieved from http://nbuviap.gov.ua/images/ukraine/2021/ukr2.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  25. Syrotyuk, Yu., Oliynyk, Yu., Kholyavka, A., & Chupak, O. (2021, Jan 13). Hlobal'ni bezpekovi, politychni, ekonomichni tendentsiyi u sviti v 2021 rotsi ta yikhniy vplyv na Ukrayinu [Global security, political, economic trends in the world in 2021 and their impact on Ukraine]. Ukrainian studies of strategic research: Website. Retrieved from https://ussd.org.ua/2021/01/13/globalni-bezpekovi-politychni-ekonomichni-tendentsiyi-u-sviti-ta-yihnij-vplyv-na-ukrayinu-v-2021-rotsi [in Ukrainian].
  26. Kalyugina, S. N., Pyanov, A. I., & Striyelkovski, V. (2020). Ugrozy i riski intellektual’noy bezopasnosti Rossii v usloviyakh mirovoy globalizatsii [Threats and risks to Russia’s intellectual security in the context of globalization]. Journal of Institutional Studies, 12(1), 117-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2020.12.1.117-127 [in Russian].
  27. Indeks yevrointehratsiynoho ekonomichnoho postupu rehioniv Ukrayiny u 2014-2019 rr. [Index of European integration economic progress of the regions of Ukraine in 2014-2019] (2020). NDO.lg.ua: Website. Retrieved from http://ndo.lg.ua/filereader/index/4080/dd14438e8b38b6db131f6368f75f39ef [in Ukrainian].
  28. Horyunov, D., Tvardovskyy, A., Koltsov, M., Yuzkiv, V., Sakhno, H., & Prokhorov, B. (2021). Otsinka ekonomichnykh vtrat Ukrayiny vid tymchasovoyi okupatsiyi Kryms’koho pivostrovu [Assessment of Ukraine’s economic losses from the temporary occupation of the Crimean peninsula]: Analytical note. Retrieved from https://www.irf.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/finale-crimea-losses-report-clean.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  29. Heyets, V. M. (2018). Endohenizatsiya rozvytku ekonomiky u vymiri rivnopravnosti vidnosyn derzhavy, biznesu ta sub»yektiv holosuvannya [Endogenization of economic development in the measurement of equality of relations between the state, business and voting entities]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 7, 3-19. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/EkUk_2018_7_2 [in Ukrainian].


Web Master P. Popadiuk