Scientific and practical journal
УКР   ENG
Regional Economy
   



Journal Regional Economy -- re2024.02.041

Repository of Institute of Regional Research UDC 332.12:330.142.21:330.043; JEL C01, O16, O18
Maksymchuk, M. V. (2024). Modelyuvannya ta otsinyuvannya parametriv produktyvnosti kapitalu rehioniv Ukrayiny [Modeling and assessment of capital productivity parameters of Ukraine’s regions]. Rehional'na ekonomika - Regional Economy, 112 (2), 41-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2024-2-3 [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 19

Authors



Maksymchuk Maksym Vitaliyovych

Doctor of Economics, Senior Researcher

Leading Researcher of the Department of regional economic policy of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine

Contacts: regionmak@i.ua, (032)270-7089

Webpages:

Resume

The article proposes a methodology for determining the factors of increasing the level of capital productivity and, accordingly, increasing the importance of this criterion in the overall productive capacity of the economy of the regions of Ukraine, substantiates the theoretical model of capital productivity, and conducts empirical verification of this model. A capital productivity level matrix was constructed, which includes key parameters grouped into three main sets of factors. The results of the conducted modeling indicate a partial strengthening of the negative trends of the effect of a decrease in the level of investment activity on capital productivity in 2021 compared to 2013. The article notes that despite the fact that increasing capital productivity is one of the main goals of investment activity, the relationship between investment and capital productivity is much more complicated and even unpredictable to a certain extent. This dependence is not necessarily linear and direct, in some cases it can have a non-linear nature and lead to negative inverse results, depending on the factors of the institutional and economic environment that has developed in different regions of the state. However, despite this, investment activities and increasing the level of capital productivity will play a significant role in the post-war reconstruction of the economy of Ukraine and its regions. Ways to increase the level of capital productivity in the regions of Ukraine are proposed, in particular: more intensive use of production capacities; priority development of less capital-intensive sectors of the economy; intensive use of investment stimulation mechanisms; increasing the share of types of economic activity with high added value; promoting the development of medium-sized and small cities, and not only large urban areas, the development of which requires significant investments in infrastructure; reduction of investment expenditures related to governance.

Keywords:

modeling, assessment, parameters, capital productivity, multifactor productivity

References

    
  1. Capital Productivity (1996). Washington, D. C.: McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/Operations/Our%20Insights/Capital%20productivity/MGI_Capital_productivity_Report.pdf
  2. Shults, S. L. (Ed.) (2022). Produktyvna spromozhnist ekonomiky rehioniv: teoretyko-metodolohichni ta prykladni aspekty [Productive capacity of regional economy: theoretical, methodological and applied aspects]: Scientific report. Lviv: Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://ird.gov.ua/irdp/p20220037.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  3. Storonyanska, I. Z. (Ed.) (2022). Ekonomika rehioniv Ukrayiny v umovakh viyny: ryzyky ta napryamky zabezpechennya stiykosti [The economy of the regions of Ukraine in the conditions of war: risks and directions of ensuring stability]. Lviv: Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine. Retrieved from http://ird.gov.ua/irdp/p20220033.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  4. Melnyk, M. I., & Leshchukh, I. V. (2022). Osoblyvosti, problemy ta stymuly relokatsiyi natsional’noho vyrobnytstva v umovakh viyny [Peculiarities, problems and incentives of relocation of national production in conditions of war]. Rehional’na ekonomika – Regional Economy, 104(2), 94-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2022-2-10 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Dmytryshyn, B. V. (2010). Doslidzhennya produktyvnosti suchasnykh ekonomichnykh system na osnovi modeley mizhhaluzevoho balansu [Research performance of contemporary economic systems based on models of interbranch balance]. Naukovi pratsi Kirovohrads’koho natsional’noho tekhnichnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky – Scientific works of the Kirovohrad National Technical University. Economic sciences, 18(2), 85-92. Retrieved from https://dspace.kntu.kr.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/65e30497-4a87-4244-a35c-6b7c10c12107/content [in Ukrainian].
  6. Filipenko, A. S. (2018). Produktyvna spromozhnist’ natsiyi: sotsial’no-ekonomichnyy vymir [Productive capacity of the nation: socio-economic dimension]. In Superechnosti strukturnoyi transformatsiyi ukrayins'koho suspil'stva v umovakh yevrointehratsiyi ta hlobalizatsiyi [Contradictions of the structural transformation of Ukrainian society in the conditions of European integration and globalization]: Proceedings of the scientific and theoretical seminar (pp. 14-18). Kyiv. Retrieved from https://www.iir.edu.ua/sites/default/files/2023-03/tezi%20seminar%2022%20march%202018%20NEW%20%281%29.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  7. Osaulenko, O., Yatsenko, O., Reznikova, N., Rusak, D., & Nitsenko, V. (2020). Produktyvna zdatnist' krayin kriz' pryzmu tsiley staloho rozvytku: vyklyky mizhnarodniy ekonomichniy bezpetsi ta konkurentospromozhnosti [The productive capacity of countries through the prism of sustainable development goals: challenges to international economic security and to competitiveness]. In Finansovo-kredytna diyal'nist': problemy teoriyi ta praktyky [Finansial and Credit Activity: Problems Theory and Practicy]: Vol. 2(33) (pp. 492-499). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v2i33.207214 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Shults, S. L., & Lutskiv, O. M. (2022). Prostorovi ta sektoral’ni determinanty produktyvnoyi spromozhnosti rehioniv: teoretychna heneza ta metodolohichni zasady doslidzhennya [Spatial and sectoral determinants of regional productive capacity: theoretical genesis and methodological principles of the study]. Rehional’na ekonomika – Regional Economy, 106(4), 5-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2022-4-1 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Mokiy, A. I., Nozdrina, L. V., & Pavlyshyn, A. I. (2024). Productive Capacity and Sustainable Development of Ukraine in The Conditions of War. Academy Review, 1(60), 62-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32342/2074-5354-2024-1-60-5
  10. Shults, S. L., Lutskiv, O. M., & Ozarkiv, K. S. (2022). Metodychni pidkhody do otsinky produktyvnoyi spromozhnosti ekonomiky: svitovyy ta yevropeys’kyy dosvid [Methodological approaches to the assessment of economic productivity: global and european experience]. Naukovi innovatsiyi ta peredovi tekhnolohiyi – Scientific innovations and advanced technologies, 12(14), 188-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-5274-2022-12(14)-188-198 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Ishchuk, S. O. (2015). Modelyuvannya dynamiky vartosti osnovnoho kapitalu vyrobnychykh pidpryyemstv [Simulating fixed capital dynamics of industrial enterprises]. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannya – Economy and forecasting, 1, 131-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2015.01.131 [in Ukrainian].
  12. Ishchuk, S. O. (2013). Kontseptual’ni zasady onovlennya osnovnoho kapitalu [Conceptual principles of fixed capital renewal]. In Sotsial’no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-economic problems of the modern period of Ukraine]: Vol. 5(103) (pp. 3-13). [in Ukrainian].
  13. Shults, S. L., & Mokiy, A. I. (Eds.) (2022). Imperatyvy ta bezpekovi priorytety zberezhennya i rozvytku produktyvnoyi spromozhnosti rehioniv Ukrayiny v umovakh viyny [Productive capacity of Ukraine’s regions preservation and development imperatives and security priorities in conditions of war]: Discussion platform proceedings. Lviv: Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://ird.gov.ua/ird02/n3381_tezy.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  14. Mokiy, A. I., Fleychuk, M. I., & Datsko, O. I. (2019, 27 feb). Stratehiya produktyvnoyi spromozhnosti rozvytku Ukrayiny v protsesi yevrointehratsiyi: metodolohichni aspekty [The strategy of the productive capacity of the development of Ukraine in the process of European integration: methodological aspects]. In Problemy rozvytku finansovykh instytutiv YeS [Problems of the development of financial institutions of the EU]: Proceedings of the international scientific conference (pp. 35-37). Kyiv: State University «Institute of Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine». Retrieved from http://ief.org.ua/docs/scc/10.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  15. Kvasha, T. K. (2019). Chynnyky zrostannya sukupnoyi faktornoyi produktyvnosti [The Drivers of the Total Factor Productivity]. Statystyka Ukrayiny – Statistics of Ukraine, 2, 12-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31767/su.2(85)2019.02.02[in Ukrainian].
  16. State Statistic Service of Ukraine: Website (2023). Retrieved from https://ukrstat.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
  17. Rehiony Ukrainy 2021 [Regions of Ukraine 2021] (2022): Statistical publication. Part II. Kyiv: State Statistics Service of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
  18. Rehiony Ukrainy 2014 [Regions of Ukraine 2014] (2014): Statistical publication. Part II. Kyiv: State Statistics Service of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
  19. Maksymchuk, M. V. (2022). Vyznachennya instytutsiynykh determinant produktyvnoyi spromozhnosti ekonomiky [Determination of institutional determinants of productive capacity of the economy]. In Imperatyvy ta bezpekovi priorytety zberezhennya i rozvytku produktyvnoyi spromozhnosti rehioniv Ukrayiny v umovakh viyny [Productive capacity of Ukraine’s regions preservation and development imperatives and security priorities in conditions of war] (pp. 65-66). Lviv: Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://ird.gov.ua/ird02/n3381_tezy.pdf [in Ukrainian].


Web Master P. Popadiuk