UDC 330.111.66:332.146.2(1-32)-026.911; JEL O18, O20
Melnyk, M. I., Leshchukh, I. V., & Melnyk, V. A. (2025). Endohenna spromozhnist' rehionu yak dominanta formuvannya yoho rezyl'yentnoyi sotsial'no-ekonomichnoyi systemy [The endogenous capacity of a region as a dominant factor in the formation of its resilient socio-economic system]. Rehional'na ekonomika - Regional Economy, 117 (3), 59-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2025-3-6 [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 13

Authors



Melnyk Maryana Ivanivna

Doctor of Economics, Professor

Head of the Department of spatial development of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine

Contacts: mar.melnyk@gmail.com, (032)270-70-53, (+38099)72-93-873

Webpages:

Leshchukh Iryna Volodymyrivna

Ph.D. of Economics, Senior Researcher

Senior Researcher, Scientific Secretary of the unit of the Department of spatial development of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine

Contacts: ira_leschukh@ukr.net, ira_borsch@mail.ru, (+38096)751-33-89

Webpages:

Melnyk Vladyslav Andriyovych

Postgraduate of the Department of regional economic policy of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine

Contacts: melnyk.vlad22@gmail.com

Webpages:

Resume

Since the 2020s, the strategic imperative and main competitive advantage for socio-economic systems has been to build resilience to unstable changes (shocks) in the external environment associated with global economic crises, natural and man-made disasters (disappearance of global biodiversity, climate change, increasing environmental pollution, natural disasters), global institutional economic and political transformations (decisions), political and ideological crises, technological and innovative breakthroughs, diplomatic confrontations, wars, pandemics, etc. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the concept of endogenous capacity of a region as a dominant factor in the formation of its resilient socio-economic system. The main factors and prerequisites for the formation of endogenous capacity of a region as a dominant factor in ensuring a resilient socio-economic system of the region are identified. The endogenous capacity for the formation of a resilient socio-economic system of the region is defined as the totality of the region’s internal potentials (human, natural, financial, institutional, social) that ensure its ability to develop independently and adapt in conditions of instability and change. Specifically, it is determined that endogenous capacity is characterized by the ability to recover and reorient after the impact of external global crises and challenges through internal adaptive drivers and internal socio-economic, institutional, and transformational potential of the region, which ensures the protection and structural renewal of the characteristics of the region’s socio-economic system in order to increase its ability to withstand negative influences, minimize losses, recover and transform quickly, while maintaining economic dynamics and social cohesion. Particular attention is paid to the factors of targeted endogenization of regional development in Ukraine, the priorities of increasing the endogenous potential of the socio-economic system from the perspective of ensuring an active frontal innovation policy, improving national ecogenetics, economic stability, and security based on the national roots of economic development.

Keywords:

region, endogenous capacity of the region, internal potential of the region, resilient socio-economic system, endogenous development

References


1. Storonyanska, I. Z. (Ed.) (2019). Stale endohenne zrostannya rehioniv Ukrayiny v umovakh detsentralizatsiyi [Sustainable endogenous growth of Ukrainian regions under decentralization]. Lviv: Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine. (Series «Problems of Regional Development»). Retrieved from http://ird.gov.ua/irdp/p20190009.pdf [in Ukrainian].
2. Melnyk, M. I. (Ed.) (2024). Rezyl'yentnist' endohennoho rozvytku rehioniv v umovakh hlobal'nykh vyklykiv ta shokiv [Resilience of endogenous development of regions in the face of global challenges and shocks]. Lviv: Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine. (Series «Problems of Regional Development»). Retrieved from https://ird.gov.ua/irdp/p20240001.pdf [in Ukrainian].
3. Melnyk, M. I., Zalutskyy, I. R., & Melnyk, V. A. (2023). Kontsept rezylentnosti ekonomiky rehioniv v umovakh endohenizatsiyi rehional'noho rozvytku [The concept of the resilience of the regional economy in conditions of endogenization of regional development]. In Sotsial’no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 2(160) (pp. 3-13). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2023-2-1 [in Ukrainian].
4. Heyets, V. M. (2020). Fenomen nestabil'nosti – vyklyk ekonomichnomu rozvytku [The phenomenon of instability as a challenge to economic development]. Kyiv: Akademperiodyka. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/akademperiodyka.403.456 [in Ukrainian].
5. Hrytsenko, A. A. (2023). Natsional'no ukorinenyy rozvytok ekonomiky yak lokal'na vidpovid' na hlobal'ni heoekonomichni zrushennya [Nationally rooted economic development as a local response to the global geoeconomic shifts]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 4(737), 38-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2023.04.038 [in Ukrainian].
6. Hrytsenko, A. A. (2024). Mekhanizmy zabezpechennya ekonomichnoyi stiykosti ta bezpeky na zasadakh natsional'noyi ukorinenosti ekonomichnoho rozvytku [Mechanisms for ensuring economic stability and security on the basis of national rootedness of economic development]. Ekonomichna teoriya – Economic theory, 3, 5-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2024.03.005 [in Ukrainian].
7. Bilotserkivets, V. V., & Zavhorodnya, O. O. (2024). Ekonomichna dynamika: suchasnyy zmist, innovatsiynyy bazys ta nastanovy dlya polityky rozvytku [Economic dynamics: modern content, innovative basis and guidelines for development policy]. Ekonomichna teoriya – Economic theory, 2, 5-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2024.02.005 [in Ukrainian].
8. Romer, P. M. (1987). Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. American Economic Review, 77(2), 56-62. Retrieved from https://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/lchrist/papers/specialization.pdf
9. Barca, F. (2009). An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Brussels. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/regi/dv/barca_report_/barca_report_en.pdf
10. Swanstrom, T. (2008). Regional resilience: A critical examination of the ecological framework. Working Paper, 07. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/59401/1/59286166X.pdf
11. Holyuk, V. Ya., Voloshchuk S. D. (2015). Do pytannya vyboru ekonomichnoho konsensusu rozvytku derzhavy cherez modelyuvannya zaoshchadzhen' [On the issue of choosing economic consensus of state development on the basis of savings modelling]. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid – Investments: practice and experience, 8, 24-29. Retrieved from http://www.investplan.com.ua/?op=1&z=4380&i=4 [in Ukrainian].
12. Haken, H. (2010). Information and Self-Organization: A Macroscopic Approach to Complex Systems. Springer.
13. Tarasevych, V. M. (Ed.) (2021). Tsyfrovyy vymir innovatsiyno-informatsiynoyi ekonomiky [Digital dimension of innovation and information economy]. Dnipro: Economy. [in Ukrainian].