UDC 711.4:332.1:351.778(477); JEL R11, R58
Danylyshyn, B. M. (2024). Upravlinnya prostorovym vidnovlennyam ta rozvytkom hromad i rehioniv Ukrayiny: stratehichni priorytety ta yevropeys'kyy vektor [Management of spatial renewal and development of communities and regions of Ukraine: strategic priorities and the European vector]. Rehional'na ekonomika - Regional Economy, 114 (4), 5-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2024-4-1 [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 20

Authors



Danylyshyn Bohdan Mykhaylovych

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Academician of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Honored Worker of Science and Technology of Ukraine

Director of the Research Institute of Regional Studies of the Kyiv National Economic University n.a. Vadym Hetman; Head of the Department of regional studies and tourism of the Faculty of Marketing of the Kyiv National Economic University n.a. Vadym Hetman

Contacts: bm65@online.ua

Webpages:

Resume

The article is devoted to the study of strategic priorities of spatial recovery and development management of communities and regions of Ukraine in the context of European integration. Particular attention is paid to the challenges that arise in the process of adaptation to European standards, in particular, the implementation of the EU cohesion policy, spatial planning and financial resource management. A critical analysis of the role of the General Scheme for Planning the Territory of Ukraine as a key instrument for harmonizing spatial development is made, and the need to strengthen the administrative capacity of authorities at the central, regional and local levels is emphasized. The purpose of the article is to provide a general overview and critical analysis of the strategic priorities and the European vector in the management of spatial restoration and development of communities and regions of Ukraine. The main emphasis is placed on the existing gaps in the practical implementation of recovery issues and the needs in connection with Ukraine’s acquisition of the EU candidate status. The article discusses the practical aspects of creating an effective spatial management system that takes into account the specifics of the affected areas and existing regional imbalances. Special emphasis is placed on international territorial cooperation and Ukraine’s participation in the European Interreg programmes and the Macro-Regional Strategy for the Danube Region. Conclusions are drawn regarding the need to ensure transparency of financial mechanisms, integration of European management practices and development of spatial recovery programmes focused on the long-term sustainable development of communities and regions. It is proved that by obtaining the status of a candidate for EU membership, Ukraine has committed itself to adaptation to EU standards in the field of regional policy. This includes improving the legislative and institutional framework, strengthening administrative capacity, and implementing high-quality development programming with proper financial management. However, progress remains limited for 2023-2024, and most of the European Commission’s recommendations have not yet been implemented.

Keywords:

public administration, spatial planning, spatial development, regional development, territorial community, post-war reconstruction, European integration

References


1. Taylor, N. (2010). What is this thing called spatial planning? An analysis of the British Government’s view. The Town Planning Review, 81(2), 193-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2009.26
2. Lesyk, O. V., & Todorova, O. L. (2021). Prostorove planuvannya terytoriy v Ukrayini: derzhavno-upravlins’kyy aspekt [Spatial planning of territories in Ukraine: public administration aspect]. Naukovi Perspektyvy – Scientific Perspectives, 4(10), 88-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2021-4(10)-88-105 [in Ukrainian].
3. Markina, M. I. (2024). Transformatsiya publichnoho upravlinnya u sferi prostorovoho planuvannya na mistsevomu rivni v konteksti yevrointehratsiynykh protsesiv Ukrayiny [Transformation of public administration in the field of spatial planning at the local level in the context of European integration processes of Ukraine]. Aktual’ni pytannya u suchasniy nautsi. Seriya: Derzhavne upravlinnya – Current Issues in Modern Science. Series: Public Administration, 10(28), 163-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6300-2024-10(28)-163-175 [in Ukrainian].
4. Pylypiv, V. V., & Tychkovska, L. P. (2013). Finansovyy mekhanizm upravlinnya stalym rozvytkom terytorial’nykh ekonomichnykh system [Financial mechanism of management of territorial economic systems sustainable development]. Rehional’na economika – Regional economy, 2(68), 72-80. [in Ukrainian].
5. Shevchenko, O. V. (2020). Formulyuvannya pidkhodiv do modelyuvannya stsenariyiv rehulyuvannya dysproportsiy u sotsial’no-ekonomichnomu rozvytku rehioniv [Formulation of approaches to modeling scenarios for regulation of imbalances in socio-economic development of regions]. Problemy ekonomiky – Problems of Economy, 1, 123-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2020-1-123-131 [in Ukrainian].
6. Obolenskyy, O., Kosytska, V., & Ohorodnyk, V. (2024). Rozvytok publichno-pryvatnoho partnerstva pry formuvanni stratehiy mistsevoho rozvytku v umovakh povoyennoyi vidbudovy [Development of public-private partnership in the formation of local development strategies in the conditions of post-war reconstruction]. In Vcheni zapysky [Scientific Notes]: Vol. 35 (pp. 130-142). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33111/vz_kneu.35.24.02.11.075.081 [in Ukrainian].
7. Danylyshyn, B. M., Shevchenko, O. V., & Ohorodnyk, V. V. (2023). Mihratsiya ta poyava bizhentsiv z Ukrayiny: naukovi pidkhody ta metodychnyy instrumentariy do usunennya nehatyvnykh naslidkiv [Migration and the emergence of refugees from Ukraine: scientific approaches and methodological tools to eliminate negative consequences]. In Vcheni zapysky [Scientific Notes]: Vol. 33(4) (pp. 274-284). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33111/vz_kneu.33.23.04.24.166.172 [in Ukrainian].
8. Pro vnesennya zmin do deyakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrayiny shchodo zasad derzhavnoyi rehional'noyi polityky ta polityky vidnovlennya rehioniv i terytoriy [On amendments to certain legislative acts of Ukraine on the principles of state regional policy and policy of recovery of regions and territories] (2022). Law of Ukraine, adopted on 2022, Jul 9, 2389-IX. Legislation of Ukraine: Website. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2389-20#Text [in Ukrainian].
9. Danylyshyn, B., & Bohdan, T. (2023, Dec 4). Perekhid do voyennoyi ekonomiky. Chotyry holovni kroky, yaki maye zrobyty Ukrayina [Transition to a military economy. Four key steps Ukraine needs to take]. ZN.ua: Website. Retrieved from https://zn.ua/ukr/macroeconomics/perekhid-do-vojennoji-ekonomiki-chotiri-holovni-kroki-jaki-maje-zrobiti-ukrajina.html [in Ukrainian].
10. Derzhbyudzhet 2025 rik: publichni investproyekty, krytychna infrastruktura, zhyttya ta pidtrymka hromad [State Budget 2025: public investment projects, critical infrastructure, housing, and community support] (2024, Nov 20). Ministry of Community and Territorial Development of Ukraine: Website. Retrieved from https://mtu.gov.ua/news/36126.html [in Ukrainian].
11. Sustersic, J. (2023, Jul 10). Analytics: Coordination of Reconstruction and Recovery with the Regional Development Policy in Ukraine. U-LEAD: Website. Retrieved from https://u-lead.org.ua/en/news/240
12. Dale, A., Vella, K., Ryan, S., Broderick, K., Hill, R., Potts, R., & Brewer, T. (2020). Governing Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Australia: International Implications. Land, 9(234). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land9070234
13. Danielzyk, R., & Münter, A. (2018). Raumplanung. Handwörterbuch der Stadt- und Raumentwicklung. Hannover: Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung. [in German].
14. Chen, J., Walker, R. M., & Sawhney, M. (2020). Public service innovation: a typology. Public Management Review, 22(11), 1674-1695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1645874
15. van Buuren, A., Lewis, J. M., & Peters, B. G. (Eds.) (2023). Policy-Making as Designing: The Added Value of Design Thinking for Public Administration and Public Policy. Bristol University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447365938.001.0001
16. Audouin, Ch. (2022). The role of multi-level governance in branding medium-sized cities: the case of Nantes, France. Cities, 123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103577
17. Pinz, A., Roudyani, N., & Thaler, J. (2018). Public-private partnerships as instruments to achieve sustainability-related objectives: the state of the art and a research agenda. Public Management Review, 20(1), 1-22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1293143
18. Lawhon, M., Follmann, A., Braun, B., Cornea, N., Greiner, C., Guma, P., Karpouzoglou, T., Diez, J. R., Schindler, S., Schramm, S., Sielker, F., Tups, G., Vij, S., & Dannenberg, P. (2023). Making heterogeneous infrastructure futures in and beyond the global south. Futures, 154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103270
19. Liu, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China. Land Use Policy, 102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105288
20. Bezhina, T., & Tretyak, Yu. (2024, Nov 19). Prohres chy rehres? Yak Yevropeys’ka Komisiya otsinyla stan sprav shchodo vraduvannya ta rehional’noyi polityky v Ukrayini ta shcho porekomenduvala robyty dali [Progress or regression? How did the European Commission assess the state of governance and regional policy in Ukraine and what did it recommend to do next?]. Decentralization: Website. Retrieved from https://decentralization.ua/news/18925 [in Ukrainian].