UDC 332.1:502/504:334.012.74; JEL R38
Butko, M. P., & Petrovska, A. S. (2018). Metodychni pidkhody do ekolohizatsiyi prostorovoho rozvytku v umovakh detsentralizatsiyi vladnykh povnovazhen' [Methodical approaches to the ecologization of the spatial development in the conditions of authorities’ decentralization]. Rehional'na ekonomika - Regional Economy, 90 (4), 74-84. Retrieved from http://re.gov.ua/doi/re2018.04.074.php. [in Ukrainian].

Authors



Butko Mykola Petrovych

Doctor of Economics, Professor

Head of the Department of management and civil service of the Chernihiv National University of Technology

Contacts: -managment_stu@mail.ru, -butko.mykola@yandex.ru, butko.mykola@ukr.net

Webpages:

Petrovska Alina Serhiyivna

Postgraduate of the Department of management of innovation activity and public administration of the Chernihiv National University of Technology

Contacts: alina777petrovskaya@gmail.com

Webpages:

Resume

The problem of providing the sustainable development is aimed at the harmonizing of social, economic and environmental spheres of social development. The purpose of the article is to substantiate methodological approaches to ecologization of spatial development in Ukraine at the present stage of state formation, which is characterized by strengthening of the decentralization authority processes. The article takes into account the new rate of reasonable and balanced growth and proves approaches to the assessment of ecological processes of the region’s development. In the conditions of the decentralization of the social systems’ management processes, the importance of the trajectory of sustainable development of territorial communities and other taxonomic units has been updated. The methodology for the territorial community’s development in the conditions of institutional changes has been approved. The current practice shows that at the level of the territorial communities the parameters of their sustainability are not calculated or analyzed, though, in the conditions of the management processes decentralization it is significantly important. In the field of environmental protection it is expedient to introduce monitoring of the settlements pollution level and to strengthen the control of human waste management. For the comprehensive assessment of the territorial community’s development we propose to use such a criterion for evaluation as a sub-regional upgrade index. The base for the index could be statistical information, which is formed by the classical method of surveys. It could become a marker of the investment attractiveness of a particular territorial community and the task for the executive power and local government to take measures for the integrated and balanced development of all taxonomic units of the state. Effective regional development management is the significant factor of the productive forces modernization of the whole state, especially in the conditions of intensified globalization and integration processes. Under these circumstances ecologization problems deserve special attention. Political direction on the authority decentralization demands increased attention from the local authority to the environmental management and environmental protection.

Keywords:

spatial development, spatial system, indicators, ecologization, decentralization

References


1. Rio-de-Zhaneyrskaya deklaratsiya po okruzhayushchey srede i razvitiyu [Rio Declaration on Environment and Development]: Adopted by the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro (1992, Jun 03-14). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ru/documents [in Russian].
2. Povestka dnya na XXI vek [Agenda 21]: Adopted by the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio-de-Zhaneyro (1992, Jun 03-14). Retrieved from http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901894820 [in Russian].
3. Paryz’ka klimatychna uhoda: shlyakhy realizatsiyi [Paris Climatic Agreement: Implementation Ways]. Holos Ukrayiny – Voice of Ukraine (2016, Apr 23). Retrieved from http://www.golos.com.ua/article/267759 [in Ukrainian].
4. Paton, B. Ye. (Ed.) (2012). Natsional’na paradyhma staloho rozvytku Ukrayiny [National paradigm of sustainable development of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of NAS of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
5. Stalyy rozvytok yak paradyhma suspil’noho zrostannya ХХІ st [Sustainable development as a paradigm of social growth in XXI century] (2009). Heohrafichnyy kaleydoskop [Geographic Kaleidoscope]: Website. Retrieved from http://www.geograf.com.ua/kaleidoscope/galleries/view-photo/19/273 [in Ukrainian].
6. Petrushenko, Yu. M. (Ed.) (2013). Mistsevyy rozvytok za uchasti hgromady [Local community development]: (Vols. 1-2): Vol. 1. Teoretychni osnovy staloho rozvytku, oriyentovanoho na hromadu [The theoretical foundations of community-based sustainable local development]. Sumy: Universitetska knyha. [in Ukrainian].
7. Pavlyuk, Yu. Yu. (2011). Prostorovyy rozvytok rehional’no-ekonomichnykh system [Spatial development of regional economic systems]. In Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ Vinnyts’koho natsional’noho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriya: ekonomichni nauky [Proceedings of Vinnytsia National Agrarian University. Series: Economics]: Vol. 2 (53) (pp. 42-47). Retrieved from http://econjournal.vsau.org/files/pdfa/1868.pdf [in Ukrainian].
8. Khvesyk, M. A., Bystryakov, I. K., & Klinovoy, D. V. (2016). Prostranstvennaya organizatsiya i napravleniya ispol’zovaniya prirodnogo bogatstva Ukrainy [Spatial organization and directions of use of natural wealth of Ukraine]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 648(7), 46-65. [in Russian].
9. Zhurovskyy, M. Z. (Ed.) (2009). Stalyy rozvytok rehioniv Ukrayiny [Sustainable development of the regions of Ukraine]. Kyiv: National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute". [in Ukrainian].
10. Tarasova, N. P., & Kruchina, Ye. B. (2006). Indeksy i indikatory ustoychivogo razvitiya [Indices and indicators of sustainable development]. Ustoychivoye razvitiye: priroda – obshchestvo – chelovek [Sustainable development: nature – society – person]: Proceedings of the international conference: Vol. 2. (pp. 127-144). Moscow, 2006. Retrieved from http://www.ustoichivo.ru/i/docs/18/tarasova.pdf [in Russian].
11. Sedov, S. B. (2009). Kontseptsiya ustoychivogo razvitiya i indikatory ustoychivogo razvitiya [The concept of sustainable development and indicators of sustainable development]. Trudy SGA – Proceedings of the MUH, 2, 71-97. Retrieved from http://www.edit.muh.ru/content/mag [in Russian].
12. Kozhukhova, T. V. (2015). Indeks rozvytku lyuds’koho potentsialu yak indykator dlya vyznachennya napryamkiv mizhnarodnoho finansuvannya prohram staloho rozvytku [Human Development Index as an indicator for determining the directions of international financing of sustainable development programs]. Problemy i perspektyvy ekonomiky ta upravlinnya – Problems and prospects of economics and management, 2, 43-48. Retrieved from http //ppeu.stu.cn.ua/index.pl?task=arcls&id=36 [in Ukrainian].
13. Pyrikov, O. V. (2013). Indykatory ta systemy staloho rozvytku: teoriya ta praktyka [Indicators and systems of sustainable development: theory and practice]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Effective economy, 11. Retrieved from http //www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=4026 [in Ukrainian].
14. Horyana, I. V. (2013). Formuvannya metodyky otsinyuvannya stalosti rozvytku rehioniv [Formation evaluation methods sustainability of regional development]. In Ekonomichnyy analiz [Economic Analysis]: Vol. 14(1) (pp. 59-63). [in Ukrainian].