UDC 658.5:005.21:339.137.2; JEL L10, L21, M21, D81
Bohdanyuk, I. V., & Mandych, S. M. (2024). Stratehichne upravlinnya bezpekoyu pidpryyemstva v umovakh hlobal'noyi konkurentsiyi [Strategic management of enterprise security in the conditions of global competition]. Rehional'na ekonomika - Regional Economy, 113 (3), 149-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2024-3-14 [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 12

Authors



Bohdanyuk Ihor Vasylyovych

Ph.D. of Law, Senior Researcher

Deputy Director for Organizational and Scientific Work and Technology Transfer in Animal Husbandry of the Institute of Animal Husbandry of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine

Contacts: bogdanyuk.hniise@gmail.com

Webpages:

Mandych Serhiy Mykolayovych

Researcher of the Department of economics, management and transfer of innovations in animal husbandry of the Institute of Animal Husbandry of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine

Contacts: mandychserhii@proton.me

Webpages:

Resume

The article examines strategic security management for enterprises in the context of global competition. In today’s world of rapid change and increasing instability, companies face numerous risks that threaten their resilience, efficiency, and competitiveness. These include economic, political, technological, and cybersecurity risks that can negatively impact a company’s operations and limit its ability to adapt to shifting market conditions. In such an environment, strategic security management plays a key role in maintaining competitive advantage and ensuring the long-term growth of the business. However, many companies still lack a properly developed security strategy, making them vulnerable to both external and internal threats. In the course of this research, theoretical and practical approaches to risk management were analyzed, and specific methods were explored to help enterprises better prepare for potential threats. Various methods were applied for this purpose, including SWOT analysis, PESTEL analysis, and risk management tools such as Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and the Monte Carlo method. The data obtained indicate that for effective security management, companies should consider both external and internal risk factors and have the ability to adapt swiftly to changes. One important direction is investing in advanced technologies. In addition, emphasis is placed on developing a security-oriented organizational culture, which involves regular staff training and fostering a responsible approach to security issues. Another critical factor for success is the flexibility of management strategies, allowing companies to respond quickly to changing market conditions and emerging threats. This article offers recommendations for improving the effectiveness of management decisions in the security field, particularly regarding regular risk analysis, the development of action plans for emergency situations, and the integration of monitoring and forecasting systems. The implementation of these strategies can help companies maintain competitiveness, reduce dependence on external factors, and ensure long-term stability.

Keywords:

strategic management, enterprise security, global competition, risks, resilience, competitiveness, organizational culture, innovative technologies, adaptability

References


1. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.
2. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. HBR: Website. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1994/01/the-fall-and-rise-of-strategic-planning
3. Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2012). Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage. 4th ed. Pearson.
4. Dyachkov, D., Potapyuk, I., & Kapran, I. (2021) Ekonomichna bezpeka v systemi stratehichnoho upravlinnya pidpryyemstvom [Economic security in the enterprise strategic management system]. Ekonomika ta suspil’stvo – Economy and Society, 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-24-7 [in Ukrainian].
5. Fedirets, O. V., Bezruchko, O. Yu., & Shykhaliyeva, A. T. (2015). Otsinyuvannya stanu stratehichnoho upravlinnya pidpryyemstva [Assessment of the State of Strategic Management of the Enterprise]. In Naukovі pratsі Poltavskoyi derzhavnoyi aharnoyi akademiyi. Ekonomichni nauky [Scientific Works of Poltava State Agrarian Academy. Economic sciences]: Vol. 1(10) (pp. 269-273). Retrieved from https://www.pdau.edu.ua/sites/default/files/nppdaa/10/42.pdf [in Ukrainian].
6. Zhykhor, O. B., & Kutsenko, T. M. (2018). Ekonomichna bezpeka [Economic Security]: Manual. Kharkiv: Kharkiv Institute of Banking of the University of Banking of the National Bank of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
7. Falchenko, O. O., & Tokar, N. B. (2018). Konkurentospromozhnist’ yak skladova ekonomichnoyi bezpeky pidpryyemstva [Competitiveness as a Component of the Economic Security of the Enterprise]. In Visnyk NTU «KHPI». Seriya: Tekhnichnyy prohres ta efektyvnist' vyrobnytstva [Bulletin of NTU «KhPI». Series: Technical Progress and Production Efficiency]: Vol. 67 (pp. 156-158). [in Ukrainian].
8. Bohoslavskyy, M. Yu., Zaborovets, K. H., & Naboka, Yu. V. (2019). Rozvytok instrumentariyu zabezpechennya stratehichnoyi stiykosti ta korporatyvnoyi bezpeky pidpryyemstva v umovakh hlobal’noyi konkurentsiyi [The toolkit’s development for joint company strategic sustainability providing and corporate security under global competition]. In Ekonomichnyy Prostir [Economic Space]: Vol. 151 (pp. 113-122). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/151-10 [in Ukrainian].
9. Druhova, O. S. (2023). Metody otsinky yak instrumenty stratehichnoho rozvytku diyal’nosti pidpryyemstv kharchovoyi promyslovosti [Evaluation methods as tools of strategic development of food industry enterprises]. Tavriys’kyy Naukovyy Vysnyk. Seriya: Ekonomika – Taurida Scientific Herald. Series: Economics, 18, 80-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-0366/2023.18.8 [in Ukrainian].
10. Akhnovska, I. O., & Hladkova, A. O. (2020). Vplyv hlobal’noho konkurentnoho seredovyshcha ekonomiky znan’ na stratehichnyy rozvytok pidpryyemstv [The Influence of the Global Competitive Environment of the Knowledge Economy on the Strategic Development of Enterprises]. Modern Economics, 24, 19-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V24(2020)03 [in Ukrainian].
11. Markina, I. A., & Potapyuk, I. P. (2017). Zahrozy ekonomichniy bezpetsi pidpryyemstva: teoretychnyy aspekt [Threats to Economic Security of the Enterprise: Theoretical Aspect]. In Visnyk Pryazovs’koho Derzhavnoho Tekhnichnoho Universytetu. Seriya: Ekonomichni Nauky [Bulletin of the Pryazovskyi State Technical University. Series: Economic Sciences]: Vol. 33 (pp. 130-137). [in Ukrainian].
12. Torkatyuk, V. I., Abolkhasanzade, A., Mitina, T. V., Kozynska, I. O., Kuzichkina, N. I., & Dril, N. V. (n.d.). Mekhanizm zabezpechennya ekonomichnoyi bezpeky pidpryyemstv [Mechanism for Ensuring Economic Security of Enterprises]. Digital repository of the Kharkiv National University of Urban Economy: Website. Retrieved from http://eprints.kname.edu.ua/38672/1/164-165.pdf [in Ukrainian].