Nowadays, society is increasingly interested in the work of local authorities and administration. Decentralization reform in Ukraine has not solved significant problems that hinder the strengthening of community control over local self-government. This article aims to find analogues of EU decisions to solve Ukrainian problems in terms of implementing public control. To address this goal, a comparative analysis of the experience of the EU and Ukraine, and the object of study are examples of the application of public control in the EU and Ukraine. Solving problems with data openness can be implemented through open meetings, maximum disclosure of information, and active use of the community website. The problem of fraud and inefficient use of budget funds can be solved by involving public organizations in inspections of government agencies. Making a mandatory conclusion from the community (for management decisions at the strategic level) will take into account their interests in the future. Especially the communities of Ukraine should pay attention to compliance with the requirements for web pages and reliability, completeness of information on them, which will allow the community to control the activities of local governments including financial control. 

local community, public control, amalgamated hromadas, local governments 

Mechanism of municipal bonds emission which includes a complex system of measures is proposed that will enable more efficient to organize municipal bond issuance as well as timely taking into consideration the changes that occur on the financial market. The stages of conducting of the analysis of opportunities for emission implementation as well as main indicators, assessment of which will give the most objective vision of borrowings expediency are allocated. 

emission, municipal bond, economic indicators, emission implementation, financial market